I get the argument that marriage equality is foundational. With marriage equality under our belts the rest of our civil rights will just fall into place. It's a compelling domino argument. But supposing it's an entirely false premise? Perhaps the foundational battle should have been and should still be amending the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include sexual orientation? Or ENDA? Maybe banning discrimination against gay Americans in the workplace, education, health care, social services and housing is more important than marriage in a world where marriage is no longer the way the majority of us choose to make our lives. Again, the prevailing argument is that marriage for all is good for all, but for the majority of us a Constitutional amendment ending segregation and discrimination might have been better.